With our closing up of Little Women and its three film adaptations, I was trying to figure out which actress best portrayed the beloved firecracker.\u00c2\u00a0 Definitely not 1949’s June Allyson.\u00c2\u00a0 She’s chatty, annoying, and her cheesy smile hurts me.\u00c2\u00a0 In my opinion Winona Ryder is a better contender, though she seems fragile and nervous for the most part.\u00c2\u00a0 She can definitely carry the role of the tortured artist, and she conveys Jo’s fitfulness for change and growth.\u00c2\u00a0 Katharine Hepburn would have to be the winner though.\u00c2\u00a0 Physically she is more like Alcott’s Jo March, and she carries the headstrong spirit better than Ryder.\u00c2\u00a0 My only complaint is that Hepburn’s “Christopher Columbus!” is really exaggerated and made me wince after the 5th time I heard it.\u00c2\u00a0 But it’s forgivable since she best represented the Jo that readers know and love.
\nWhile I was thinking about the character of Jo March, something hit […]<\/p>\n
Original post by cdame2of<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" With our closing up of Little Women and its three film adaptations, I was trying to figure out which actress best portrayed the beloved firecracker.\u00c2\u00a0 Definitely not 1949’s June Allyson.\u00c2\u00a0 She’s chatty, annoying, and her cheesy smile hurts me.\u00c2\u00a0 In … Continue reading