Three movies based on the same book, and the 1933 version and the 1949 version seem to be the same movie only one is in color while one black and white. I mean, it makes sense that the plot to the movie is the same considering they’re adaptations of the book Little Women.\u00c2\u00a0 Naturally, the 1994 version is more entertaining to view (not because of the actors necessarily), because the camera moves more.\u00c2\u00a0 Watching a movie where the camera is pretty much stationary can be rather dull, and it makes it easier to zone out.
\nSome people feel that Winona Ryder as “Jo” was a mistake.\u00c2\u00a0 That she is “too hollywood.”\u00c2\u00a0 I disagree.\u00c2\u00a0 Katharine Hepburn and June Allyson made “Jo” into an obnoxious character, who constantly interrupted others and dominating every conversation “Jo” was in.\u00c2\u00a0 I have always been fond of the character “Jo” in the book; she was the character […]<\/p>\n
Original post by Amanda<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Three movies based on the same book, and the 1933 version and the 1949 version seem to be the same movie only one is in color while one black and white. I mean, it makes sense that the plot to … Continue reading