<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fallen Angels.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.elsweb.org/serena/2007/04/27/fallen-angels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.elsweb.org/serena/2007/04/27/fallen-angels/</link>
	<description>"Not the fuzzy end of the lollipop."</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.elsweb.org/serena/2007/04/27/fallen-angels/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.elsweb.org/serena/2007/04/27/fallen-angels/#comment-299</guid>
		<description>Agreed, this is a remarkable film.  I personally like the more over-the-top Chinese gangster film's  like &lt;em&gt;Hard Boiled&lt;/em&gt;.  John  Woo really invented (well, not really) the two-handed pistol approach in high-action scenes, and &lt;em&gt;Hard Boiled&lt;/em&gt; is just so far over the top that it is not only compelling but really a gas.  One criticism I find with Wong Kar-wai is he takes himself a bit too seriously, He is obviously reframing Woo's stuff (like Hard Boiled and The Killer), who has re-framed many before him. However, Kar-wai seems to be trying to create a Hong Kong/Tarantino mashup given the "independent feel and young, disaffected gun crazed couple." Frankly, I find this a bit ironic because so much of Tarantino's work is directly lifted from Hong Kong, Kar-wai's "tracking him back" so soon after his explosion almost seems like filmic opportunism. This is proven even more so by his following film, &lt;em&gt;In the Mood for Love&lt;/em&gt;, which was just a bad, "Sony Classics" style European art film - kinda pretty and an absolute mess narratively.

So there's a round-about criticism of a pretty powerful film. Like the Anarchy Player, by the way ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, this is a remarkable film.  I personally like the more over-the-top Chinese gangster film&#8217;s  like <em>Hard Boiled</em>.  John  Woo really invented (well, not really) the two-handed pistol approach in high-action scenes, and <em>Hard Boiled</em> is just so far over the top that it is not only compelling but really a gas.  One criticism I find with Wong Kar-wai is he takes himself a bit too seriously, He is obviously reframing Woo&#8217;s stuff (like Hard Boiled and The Killer), who has re-framed many before him. However, Kar-wai seems to be trying to create a Hong Kong/Tarantino mashup given the &#8220;independent feel and young, disaffected gun crazed couple.&#8221; Frankly, I find this a bit ironic because so much of Tarantino&#8217;s work is directly lifted from Hong Kong, Kar-wai&#8217;s &#8220;tracking him back&#8221; so soon after his explosion almost seems like filmic opportunism. This is proven even more so by his following film, <em>In the Mood for Love</em>, which was just a bad, &#8220;Sony Classics&#8221; style European art film - kinda pretty and an absolute mess narratively.</p>
<p>So there&#8217;s a round-about criticism of a pretty powerful film. Like the Anarchy Player, by the way ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
